<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 772 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341802</link>
    <description>HC held in favour of the assessee: filing Form 10 during reassessment proceedings supplies the benefit of accumulation under s.11(2). The court applied prior HC decisions and treated the Rule 17 time for furnishing Form 10 as extending to the period available for filing a return under s.139(4), so a Form 10 filed in reassessment is within time. Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. The SC&#039;s observation that Form 10 must be filed before completion of assessment was construed as satisfied on the present facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 772 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341802</link>
      <description>HC held in favour of the assessee: filing Form 10 during reassessment proceedings supplies the benefit of accumulation under s.11(2). The court applied prior HC decisions and treated the Rule 17 time for furnishing Form 10 as extending to the period available for filing a return under s.139(4), so a Form 10 filed in reassessment is within time. Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. The SC&#039;s observation that Form 10 must be filed before completion of assessment was construed as satisfied on the present facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>