https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341797 The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that Resale Price Method (RPM) was the most appropriate method for benchmarking the assessee's international transactions. The Transfer Pricing adjustment made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was rightly deleted, and the additional evidence admitted by the CIT(A) was deemed unnecessary as RPM was upheld. The decision was pronounced in open court on 17.04.2017. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:59:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341797 The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that Resale Price Method (RPM) was the most appropriate method for benchmarking the assessee's international transactions. The Transfer Pricing adjustment made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was rightly deleted, and the additional evidence admitted by the CIT(A) was deemed unnecessary as RPM was upheld. The decision was pronounced in open court on 17.04.2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341797