<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (3) TMI 64 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191745</link>
    <description>A receipt assessed as income from undisclosed sources cannot be recharacterised as business income for excess profits tax unless the record contains material supporting that specific connection. The assessment material here did not state any reason showing that the sum arose from business activity, and the appellate material likewise only showed income from an undisclosed source. In the absence of a factual basis linking the receipt to business operations, the inference of business income was unwarranted and unsustainable. Prior treatment of a similar amount in the earlier year also indicated that it had not been treated as excess profits tax business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (3) TMI 64 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191745</link>
      <description>A receipt assessed as income from undisclosed sources cannot be recharacterised as business income for excess profits tax unless the record contains material supporting that specific connection. The assessment material here did not state any reason showing that the sum arose from business activity, and the appellate material likewise only showed income from an undisclosed source. In the absence of a factual basis linking the receipt to business operations, the inference of business income was unwarranted and unsustainable. Prior treatment of a similar amount in the earlier year also indicated that it had not been treated as excess profits tax business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>