<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 752 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341782</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for Rectification of Mistake (ROM) regarding Service Tax liability due to being filed beyond the statutory timeline of six months from the receipt of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for ROM applications, highlighting the need for timely submissions to maintain the validity of such requests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:52:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 752 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341782</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application for Rectification of Mistake (ROM) regarding Service Tax liability due to being filed beyond the statutory timeline of six months from the receipt of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for ROM applications, highlighting the need for timely submissions to maintain the validity of such requests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>