https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341776 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant consequential relief, as it found that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on duty paid chassis and other inputs used in body building. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant did not contravene exemption conditions and should not be denied credit on all inputs based on Rule 3(7) when an exemption notification did not mandate such denial. The decision highlighted the importance of interpreting exemption notifications and Cenvat credit rules to prevent misuse of benefits and ensure compliance with the law. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 May 2017 11:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341776 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant consequential relief, as it found that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on duty paid chassis and other inputs used in body building. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant did not contravene exemption conditions and should not be denied credit on all inputs based on Rule 3(7) when an exemption notification did not mandate such denial. The decision highlighted the importance of interpreting exemption notifications and Cenvat credit rules to prevent misuse of benefits and ensure compliance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341776