<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 744 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341774</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was discussed for several factory-related items on a user-based eligibility approach. Railway track material used inside the factory for movement of raw materials and finished goods was treated as part of the material handling system and credit was allowed. Lighting equipment, fittings and fixtures used for continuous illumination of the factory premises were also treated as eligible for supporting manufacturing activity, and denial was set aside. Welding electrodes were covered by prior jurisdictional and earlier case law and credit was allowed. Refractory cement blocks and plates, and steel items, beams and other miscellaneous items, were remanded for fresh adjudication because the issues were not finally examined or sufficiently reasoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 744 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341774</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was discussed for several factory-related items on a user-based eligibility approach. Railway track material used inside the factory for movement of raw materials and finished goods was treated as part of the material handling system and credit was allowed. Lighting equipment, fittings and fixtures used for continuous illumination of the factory premises were also treated as eligible for supporting manufacturing activity, and denial was set aside. Welding electrodes were covered by prior jurisdictional and earlier case law and credit was allowed. Refractory cement blocks and plates, and steel items, beams and other miscellaneous items, were remanded for fresh adjudication because the issues were not finally examined or sufficiently reasoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>