<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 737 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341767</link>
    <description>The tribunal largely dismissed the appeals filed by the main appellant and other appellants, upholding duty demands and penalties for intentional evasion of central excise duty through the creation of &quot;dummy&quot; units. The duty liabilities for the years 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04 were confirmed, with penalties imposed on key individuals involved in the evasion scheme. Smt. Lata Jain&#039;s penalty was reduced, but overall, the tribunal affirmed the findings of the adjudicating authority regarding the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 737 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341767</link>
      <description>The tribunal largely dismissed the appeals filed by the main appellant and other appellants, upholding duty demands and penalties for intentional evasion of central excise duty through the creation of &quot;dummy&quot; units. The duty liabilities for the years 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04 were confirmed, with penalties imposed on key individuals involved in the evasion scheme. Smt. Lata Jain&#039;s penalty was reduced, but overall, the tribunal affirmed the findings of the adjudicating authority regarding the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>