<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 715 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341745</link>
    <description>The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid by the Tribunal due to procedural lapses and lack of proper reasons for reopening beyond the four-year period. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment, as the AO failed to make any additions based on the initial reasons for reopening and proceeded to make additions on new grounds without issuing a fresh notice. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 715 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341745</link>
      <description>The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid by the Tribunal due to procedural lapses and lack of proper reasons for reopening beyond the four-year period. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment, as the AO failed to make any additions based on the initial reasons for reopening and proceeded to make additions on new grounds without issuing a fresh notice. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>