<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 709 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341739</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of both Transportation Charges and material rejection costs. The judgment highlighted the significance of business expediency and the requirement for expenses to be incurred for commercial purposes, even if benefiting a third party. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reexamine the material rejection cost issue, focusing on delivery challans and debit notes, and providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 709 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341739</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of both Transportation Charges and material rejection costs. The judgment highlighted the significance of business expediency and the requirement for expenses to be incurred for commercial purposes, even if benefiting a third party. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reexamine the material rejection cost issue, focusing on delivery challans and debit notes, and providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>