https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341732 The tribunal upheld the chargeability of service tax on empanelment fees under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) category. It ruled that the appellant did not suppress facts to evade tax, limiting the demand to the normal period. The tribunal differentiated the case from a High Court judgment on mandap keeper services. The matter was remanded for quantifying the confirmed demand and addressing liability on Mandap Keeper Services. The appellant's request for credit on tax paid by caterers was left for the adjudicating authority. The appeal was partly allowed, requiring further proceedings for recalculating the demand. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341732 The tribunal upheld the chargeability of service tax on empanelment fees under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) category. It ruled that the appellant did not suppress facts to evade tax, limiting the demand to the normal period. The tribunal differentiated the case from a High Court judgment on mandap keeper services. The matter was remanded for quantifying the confirmed demand and addressing liability on Mandap Keeper Services. The appellant's request for credit on tax paid by caterers was left for the adjudicating authority. The appeal was partly allowed, requiring further proceedings for recalculating the demand. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341732