<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 28 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7549</link>
    <description>Section 46(2) of the Estate Duty Act applied because the deceased&#039;s withdrawal within two years of death discharged a liability that would have fallen within section 46(1), so the amount was correctly included in the estate. House No. 85, Nallagunta was not includible under section 10 because the donee had taken bona fide possession and enjoyment, and the donor was not shown to have retained a prohibited benefit, so exclusion from the estate was allowed. The N.G.P. notes and the Pioneer Bazar, Bolarum house properties were includible under section 10 because the deceased continued to receive and use the income, showing that the donee had not enjoyed the property to the donor&#039;s entire exclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 28 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7549</link>
      <description>Section 46(2) of the Estate Duty Act applied because the deceased&#039;s withdrawal within two years of death discharged a liability that would have fallen within section 46(1), so the amount was correctly included in the estate. House No. 85, Nallagunta was not includible under section 10 because the donee had taken bona fide possession and enjoyment, and the donor was not shown to have retained a prohibited benefit, so exclusion from the estate was allowed. The N.G.P. notes and the Pioneer Bazar, Bolarum house properties were includible under section 10 because the deceased continued to receive and use the income, showing that the donee had not enjoyed the property to the donor&#039;s entire exclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>