<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 701 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341731</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal accepted that the appeal was filed within the stipulated time frame under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a reasoned order after providing the appellant with an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:03:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 701 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341731</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal accepted that the appeal was filed within the stipulated time frame under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a reasoned order after providing the appellant with an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>