https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341726 Special Leave Petitions were dismissed for want of merit because no substantial question warranting interference under Article 136 was shown, and the Court did not adjudicate the underlying dispute on the merits. Despite dismissal, the petitioners were granted four weeks' further time from the date of the order to comply with the deposit direction already made, as limited relief to enable payment of the specified amount. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Apr 2017 09:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341726 Special Leave Petitions were dismissed for want of merit because no substantial question warranting interference under Article 136 was shown, and the Court did not adjudicate the underlying dispute on the merits. Despite dismissal, the petitioners were granted four weeks' further time from the date of the order to comply with the deposit direction already made, as limited relief to enable payment of the specified amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341726