<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 695 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341725</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals, stating they were not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and directed the appellants to approach the Supreme Court under Section 35L. The court emphasized that issues concerning exemption notifications and the commencement of commercial production directly impact the rate of duty and should be addressed by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 695 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341725</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals, stating they were not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and directed the appellants to approach the Supreme Court under Section 35L. The court emphasized that issues concerning exemption notifications and the commencement of commercial production directly impact the rate of duty and should be addressed by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>