https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341723 The court allowed the petitions, quashed the Tribunal's order dismissing the appeals, and restored the appeals for further proceedings. The court considered the challenges faced by the petitioners in complying with the pre-deposit order, including technical difficulties and the delay in filing the petitions due to the hospitalization of the company director. Despite the delay in making the pre-deposit, the court found the reasons provided by the petitioners justified and reinstated the appeals based on the timely deposit of the required amount within an extended deadline. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341723 The court allowed the petitions, quashed the Tribunal's order dismissing the appeals, and restored the appeals for further proceedings. The court considered the challenges faced by the petitioners in complying with the pre-deposit order, including technical difficulties and the delay in filing the petitions due to the hospitalization of the company director. Despite the delay in making the pre-deposit, the court found the reasons provided by the petitioners justified and reinstated the appeals based on the timely deposit of the required amount within an extended deadline. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341723