<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 684 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341714</link>
    <description>Tamarind Kernel Powder was treated as classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 1301.10, based on an earlier determination applying the tariff entry and HSN notes in the same assessee&#039;s matter. The duty demand required recomputation by extending cum-duty price benefit, while the extended limitation period was not maintainable. The demand was therefore to be reworked without applying the extended period, with the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh computation. The stated principle is that an earlier classification determination concerning the same goods and assessee governs subsequent proceedings, subject to recomputation consistent with prior findings on valuation and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 684 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341714</link>
      <description>Tamarind Kernel Powder was treated as classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 1301.10, based on an earlier determination applying the tariff entry and HSN notes in the same assessee&#039;s matter. The duty demand required recomputation by extending cum-duty price benefit, while the extended limitation period was not maintainable. The demand was therefore to be reworked without applying the extended period, with the matter remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh computation. The stated principle is that an earlier classification determination concerning the same goods and assessee governs subsequent proceedings, subject to recomputation consistent with prior findings on valuation and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>