https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341711 The High Court upheld the CESTAT order partially proving charges against a Customs House Agent but deemed them insufficient for license revocation. The Court found that the revocation of the license for two years was an adequate punishment for technical breaches and violations, emphasizing that factual findings could not be re-evaluated. The Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that the majority view on technical breaches did not raise substantial legal questions. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341711 The High Court upheld the CESTAT order partially proving charges against a Customs House Agent but deemed them insufficient for license revocation. The Court found that the revocation of the license for two years was an adequate punishment for technical breaches and violations, emphasizing that factual findings could not be re-evaluated. The Court dismissed the revenue's appeal, stating that the majority view on technical breaches did not raise substantial legal questions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341711