https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341703 The dispute was limited to implementation of a one-time settlement with Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation after the earlier monetary claims ceased to survive. The parties placed the settlement terms on record and confirmed that the corporation had accepted the arrangement. In view of that settlement, the Court directed compliance with the written terms, permitted payment from the amount lying with the Registry, required issuance of a no due certificate by IDBI Bank on receipt of payment, and left the balance invested. Liberty was reserved to pursue a fresh application against IFCI. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Apr 2017 08:00:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341703 The dispute was limited to implementation of a one-time settlement with Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation after the earlier monetary claims ceased to survive. The parties placed the settlement terms on record and confirmed that the corporation had accepted the arrangement. In view of that settlement, the Court directed compliance with the written terms, permitted payment from the amount lying with the Registry, required issuance of a no due certificate by IDBI Bank on receipt of payment, and left the balance invested. Liberty was reserved to pursue a fresh application against IFCI. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341703