<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 669 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341699</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, allowing the respondent&#039;s claimed expenditure as revenue expenditure. The court directed that any depreciation taken on the allowed expenditure should be reversed by the assessing authority. The appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 669 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341699</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, allowing the respondent&#039;s claimed expenditure as revenue expenditure. The court directed that any depreciation taken on the allowed expenditure should be reversed by the assessing authority. The appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>