https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34341 Revenue seems to have been entirely motivated in ensuring that the refunds due to the petitioner / assessee are somehow not given effect to and that the demand is made so as to ensure that all other periods, available to the petitioner, are shortened. This is a plain case of abuse of power under Section 220(1) which no Court can countenanc - HC en-us Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:59:54 +0530 Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:59:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34341 Revenue seems to have been entirely motivated in ensuring that the refunds due to the petitioner / assessee are somehow not given effect to and that the demand is made so as to ensure that all other periods, available to the petitioner, are shortened. This is a plain case of abuse of power under Section 220(1) which no Court can countenanc - HC Highlights Income Tax Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:59:54 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34341