<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 658 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO, ruling in favor of the Assessee. The Tribunal found that the AO did not apply an independent mind and lacked tangible material to support the reopening of the assessment. By emphasizing the importance of valid reasons for reassessment and aligning with legal precedents, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal and invalidated the reassessment, which deviated from the initially declared loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2017 07:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 658 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO, ruling in favor of the Assessee. The Tribunal found that the AO did not apply an independent mind and lacked tangible material to support the reopening of the assessment. By emphasizing the importance of valid reasons for reassessment and aligning with legal precedents, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal and invalidated the reassessment, which deviated from the initially declared loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>