https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191725 An executive power allowing the State Government to extend a preventive order beyond two months under section 144(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was found to impose an unreasonable restriction on freedoms under Article 19(1)(b), (c) and (d). The restriction was unreasonable because it enabled continuation of the order without notice, without a right of representation, and without appeal or revision, while the safeguards attached to the Magistrate's order did not apply to the Government's notification. The provision was therefore not protected by Articles 19(3), 19(4) or 19(5) and was struck down. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191725 An executive power allowing the State Government to extend a preventive order beyond two months under section 144(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was found to impose an unreasonable restriction on freedoms under Article 19(1)(b), (c) and (d). The restriction was unreasonable because it enabled continuation of the order without notice, without a right of representation, and without appeal or revision, while the safeguards attached to the Magistrate's order did not apply to the Government's notification. The provision was therefore not protected by Articles 19(3), 19(4) or 19(5) and was struck down. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191725