https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191722 Section 112 of the Ajmer Tenancy and Land Records Act, 1950, read with the Ajmer Government Wards Regulation, 1888, was treated as unconstitutional because it authorised an indefinite executive takeover of property management on a subjective determination, without effective judicial safeguards. The Court held that this abridged the right to hold and manage property under Article 19(1)(f) and was void to that extent. It also held that the scheme was penal in character and could not be justified as a reasonable restriction under Article 19(5). Further, the provision did not fall within Article 31-A, as it did not provide for State acquisition or constitutionally relevant extinguishment or modification of proprietary rights, but only suspended management. en-us Fri, 15 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191722 Section 112 of the Ajmer Tenancy and Land Records Act, 1950, read with the Ajmer Government Wards Regulation, 1888, was treated as unconstitutional because it authorised an indefinite executive takeover of property management on a subjective determination, without effective judicial safeguards. The Court held that this abridged the right to hold and manage property under Article 19(1)(f) and was void to that extent. It also held that the scheme was penal in character and could not be justified as a reasonable restriction under Article 19(5). Further, the provision did not fall within Article 31-A, as it did not provide for State acquisition or constitutionally relevant extinguishment or modification of proprietary rights, but only suspended management. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 May 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191722