https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191719 A petition under Article 32 was held not maintainable as a public interest litigation because the dispute concerned internal management issues of a public trust and was essentially an inter se family dispute. The alleged violations of Articles 21, 49 and 51A(f) were found too vague, indirect and remote to show a direct invasion of fundamental rights of the petitioners or the public at large, so no enforceable constitutional breach was made out. The matter was considered more appropriately addressed under sections 37 and 38 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, broadly corresponding to sections 91 and 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, rather than through PIL. en-us Mon, 14 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191719 A petition under Article 32 was held not maintainable as a public interest litigation because the dispute concerned internal management issues of a public trust and was essentially an inter se family dispute. The alleged violations of Articles 21, 49 and 51A(f) were found too vague, indirect and remote to show a direct invasion of fundamental rights of the petitioners or the public at large, so no enforceable constitutional breach was made out. The matter was considered more appropriately addressed under sections 37 and 38 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, broadly corresponding to sections 91 and 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, rather than through PIL. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191719