<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (9) TMI 47 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7539</link>
    <description>When property belonging to a person not liable for tax arrears is sold in revenue recovery proceedings, the owner may recover its value under the applicable revenue recovery statute. The text explains that a vehicle sold by revenue authorities in execution of an income-tax recovery certificate remained the owner&#039;s property despite the purchaser holding only limited rights under a hire-purchase arrangement. It further notes that the statutory remedy under section 17 of the Madras Revenue Recovery Act applies where such third-party property is sold, and that the owner&#039;s claim is not defeated merely because the claim petition was not finally disposed of before the dispute arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (9) TMI 47 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7539</link>
      <description>When property belonging to a person not liable for tax arrears is sold in revenue recovery proceedings, the owner may recover its value under the applicable revenue recovery statute. The text explains that a vehicle sold by revenue authorities in execution of an income-tax recovery certificate remained the owner&#039;s property despite the purchaser holding only limited rights under a hire-purchase arrangement. It further notes that the statutory remedy under section 17 of the Madras Revenue Recovery Act applies where such third-party property is sold, and that the owner&#039;s claim is not defeated merely because the claim petition was not finally disposed of before the dispute arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>