https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191712 Concurrent factual findings that there was no reliable evidence of ill-treatment, supported by the parties' correspondence and the wife's stated unwillingness to return to the matrimonial home, left no basis for appellate interference with the decree for restitution of conjugal rights. The question of burden of proof was treated as immaterial at that stage because both sides had led evidence and the findings turned on appraisal of the record. In the absence of the relevant documents and given the concurrent findings of fact, the Supreme Court declined to reappraise the evidence and refused interference with the decree. en-us Wed, 08 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191712 Concurrent factual findings that there was no reliable evidence of ill-treatment, supported by the parties' correspondence and the wife's stated unwillingness to return to the matrimonial home, left no basis for appellate interference with the decree for restitution of conjugal rights. The question of burden of proof was treated as immaterial at that stage because both sides had led evidence and the findings turned on appraisal of the record. In the absence of the relevant documents and given the concurrent findings of fact, the Supreme Court declined to reappraise the evidence and refused interference with the decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191712