https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191704 The appeal was filed against an order dismissing it as untimely. The appellant argued that time spent pursuing rectification should not count towards the limitation period. The Member (Judicial) found the appellant diligently pursued remedies and was not negligent. Relying on case law, the Member (Judicial) held the appeal was not time-barred. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for a decision on merits, granting the appellant a personal hearing. The appeal was allowed by remand. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191704 The appeal was filed against an order dismissing it as untimely. The appellant argued that time spent pursuing rectification should not count towards the limitation period. The Member (Judicial) found the appellant diligently pursued remedies and was not negligent. Relying on case law, the Member (Judicial) held the appeal was not time-barred. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for a decision on merits, granting the appellant a personal hearing. The appeal was allowed by remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191704