<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 635 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341665</link>
    <description>A coordinate Bench ruling on the classification of Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes could not be departed from by the Tribunal without referring the issue to a larger Bench, as judicial discipline required it to address the earlier view first. The Tribunal also proceeded on a classification basis not urged by the parties, which warranted fresh consideration. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for de novo adjudication, with all contentions left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 635 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341665</link>
      <description>A coordinate Bench ruling on the classification of Imaging Plates and IP Cassettes could not be departed from by the Tribunal without referring the issue to a larger Bench, as judicial discipline required it to address the earlier view first. The Tribunal also proceeded on a classification basis not urged by the parties, which warranted fresh consideration. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for de novo adjudication, with all contentions left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>