<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 620 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341650</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of notices issued under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of a valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; for initiating reassessment proceedings. The Court found that the Assessing Officer had provided sufficient information indicating a nexus between the information possessed and the belief formed, justifying the initiation of proceedings. Criticizing the previous judgment, the Court concluded that the Assessing Officer had legitimate grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions challenging the notices. This case sets a precedent for ensuring adherence to legal requirements in tax reassessment processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 620 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341650</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of notices issued under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of a valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; for initiating reassessment proceedings. The Court found that the Assessing Officer had provided sufficient information indicating a nexus between the information possessed and the belief formed, justifying the initiation of proceedings. Criticizing the previous judgment, the Court concluded that the Assessing Officer had legitimate grounds to believe that income had escaped assessment, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions challenging the notices. This case sets a precedent for ensuring adherence to legal requirements in tax reassessment processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>