<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 616 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341646</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It affirmed that the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activities were integral to the project, making them eligible for deduction under Section 80HH based on gross total income from industrial undertakings. Despite the lack of detailed records, the Court endorsed the ITAT&#039;s decision to remit the matter to the Assessing Officer for calculating the deduction specifically for manufacturing activities. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no substantial question of law, and rejected all pending applications related to the assessment of tax benefits for manufacturing and construction activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 06:59:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 616 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341646</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding the interpretation of Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It affirmed that the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activities were integral to the project, making them eligible for deduction under Section 80HH based on gross total income from industrial undertakings. Despite the lack of detailed records, the Court endorsed the ITAT&#039;s decision to remit the matter to the Assessing Officer for calculating the deduction specifically for manufacturing activities. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no substantial question of law, and rejected all pending applications related to the assessment of tax benefits for manufacturing and construction activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>