<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 605 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341635</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed appeals by both the revenue and the assessee, upholding decisions made by the CIT(A) regarding prior period expenses, forex derivative loss, depreciation on energy efficient devices, rented out buildings, interest on capital WIP, and building repair expenses. The ITAT emphasized the accrual principle for prior period expenses and the necessity of verifying details before disallowing claims, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on all issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 06:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 605 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341635</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed appeals by both the revenue and the assessee, upholding decisions made by the CIT(A) regarding prior period expenses, forex derivative loss, depreciation on energy efficient devices, rented out buildings, interest on capital WIP, and building repair expenses. The ITAT emphasized the accrual principle for prior period expenses and the necessity of verifying details before disallowing claims, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on all issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>