<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (10) TMI 34 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7530</link>
    <description>A reassessment under section 34 covering the assessee&#039;s total income from one composite business permitted recomputation of the whole assessable income, even though the Income-tax Officer had treated the receipts under separate transport and lorry heads. The earlier limitation on reassessment, applicable where only escaped or under-assessed income was in issue, did not control this situation because the reassessment concerned the same business as a whole. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s enhancement of the revised income was therefore unsustainable, as it rested only on the mistaken view that the Income-tax Officer could not reduce one component while increasing another. The answer was in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (10) TMI 34 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7530</link>
      <description>A reassessment under section 34 covering the assessee&#039;s total income from one composite business permitted recomputation of the whole assessable income, even though the Income-tax Officer had treated the receipts under separate transport and lorry heads. The earlier limitation on reassessment, applicable where only escaped or under-assessed income was in issue, did not control this situation because the reassessment concerned the same business as a whole. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s enhancement of the revised income was therefore unsustainable, as it rested only on the mistaken view that the Income-tax Officer could not reduce one component while increasing another. The answer was in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>