<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 597 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341627</link>
    <description>Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not require reversal of credit for calcined lime that arose unavoidably as a by-product during manufacture of lime. The provision was confined to exempted goods, and a by-product or incidental waste generated in the manufacturing process did not fall within that category. The analysis also relied on the view that credit on inputs contained in such by-products remained admissible, supported by the relevant Board clarification. On that basis, Rule 6(3) was held inapplicable and no Cenvat credit reversal was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 597 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341627</link>
      <description>Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not require reversal of credit for calcined lime that arose unavoidably as a by-product during manufacture of lime. The provision was confined to exempted goods, and a by-product or incidental waste generated in the manufacturing process did not fall within that category. The analysis also relied on the view that credit on inputs contained in such by-products remained admissible, supported by the relevant Board clarification. On that basis, Rule 6(3) was held inapplicable and no Cenvat credit reversal was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>