<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Unexplained Investment for Flat Challenged; Payment Claims Unsubstantiated by Evidence, Broker and Society Deny Receipt.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34297</link>
    <description>Addition of sum paid to secure the possession of the flat - unexplained investment - since the broker had denied the receipt of payment and the Society had also denied the same, the AO could not have held that the assessee had paid a sum to Shri Chokhani for securing the possession of the flat though no paper evidencing the payment except a letter of the broker was seized - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:29:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Unexplained Investment for Flat Challenged; Payment Claims Unsubstantiated by Evidence, Broker and Society Deny Receipt.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34297</link>
      <description>Addition of sum paid to secure the possession of the flat - unexplained investment - since the broker had denied the receipt of payment and the Society had also denied the same, the AO could not have held that the assessee had paid a sum to Shri Chokhani for securing the possession of the flat though no paper evidencing the payment except a letter of the broker was seized - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:29:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>