<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 589 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for a fresh examination regarding the construction of single unit houses, determining whether it falls under the service tax levy for &#039;construction of residential complex.&#039; The appellant&#039;s arguments on the services provided not being covered under specific sections of the Finance Act were acknowledged, leading to a reexamination of all facts. The Tribunal also considered cited decisions and noted the failure of the impugned order to address crucial facts, such as the nature of construction and the exemption possibility for constructing a milk parlour for a State Govt.&#039;s Enterprise, prompting a reevaluation of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 589 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for a fresh examination regarding the construction of single unit houses, determining whether it falls under the service tax levy for &#039;construction of residential complex.&#039; The appellant&#039;s arguments on the services provided not being covered under specific sections of the Finance Act were acknowledged, leading to a reexamination of all facts. The Tribunal also considered cited decisions and noted the failure of the impugned order to address crucial facts, such as the nature of construction and the exemption possibility for constructing a milk parlour for a State Govt.&#039;s Enterprise, prompting a reevaluation of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>