<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 585 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341615</link>
    <description>Exemption and rebate notifications must be strictly construed, and where a condition refers to the &quot;difference between&quot; two rebate amounts without prescribing a subtraction sequence, the phrase may be read as an absolute difference. On that construction, condition (c) to the first proviso of Notification No. 41/2012-S.T. did not require one rebate figure to be treated as the minuend and the other as the subtrahend. The denial of rebate on the basis of a directed mathematical subtraction was therefore not justified, and the interpretation adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:03:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 585 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341615</link>
      <description>Exemption and rebate notifications must be strictly construed, and where a condition refers to the &quot;difference between&quot; two rebate amounts without prescribing a subtraction sequence, the phrase may be read as an absolute difference. On that construction, condition (c) to the first proviso of Notification No. 41/2012-S.T. did not require one rebate figure to be treated as the minuend and the other as the subtrahend. The denial of rebate on the basis of a directed mathematical subtraction was therefore not justified, and the interpretation adopted by the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>