<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 580 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant was ineligible for a refund of cess paid on exported tobacco products as they did not challenge the assessed shipping bills. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of challenging assessment orders before seeking refunds and proving non-passing on of refund amounts to others to avoid unjust enrichment. The appeal was rejected based on these principles and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:02:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 580 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant was ineligible for a refund of cess paid on exported tobacco products as they did not challenge the assessed shipping bills. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of challenging assessment orders before seeking refunds and proving non-passing on of refund amounts to others to avoid unjust enrichment. The appeal was rejected based on these principles and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>