<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 579 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the failure to adhere to the prescribed time limit under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation 2013 (CBLR), emphasizing the mandatory nature of statutory time limits and the legal precedent supporting such adherence. As a result, the appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of strict compliance with time limits in customs proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 579 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the failure to adhere to the prescribed time limit under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation 2013 (CBLR), emphasizing the mandatory nature of statutory time limits and the legal precedent supporting such adherence. As a result, the appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of strict compliance with time limits in customs proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>