<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (3) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7521</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that only the value of the right to possession and enjoyment in the Mayavaram Lodge, not the entire property value, would pass on the deceased&#039;s death. The court emphasized the significance of non-exclusion in determining estate duty liability and directed the revenue to reassess the value considering all relevant factors. The judgment balanced the duty liability based on the non-exclusion aspect, highlighting the need for a nuanced approach in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (3) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7521</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that only the value of the right to possession and enjoyment in the Mayavaram Lodge, not the entire property value, would pass on the deceased&#039;s death. The court emphasized the significance of non-exclusion in determining estate duty liability and directed the revenue to reassess the value considering all relevant factors. The judgment balanced the duty liability based on the non-exclusion aspect, highlighting the need for a nuanced approach in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>