https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341605 The Court dismissed the company application as not maintainable, stating that the reliefs sought did not relate to the sanctioned scheme but rather to a civil dispute over property title. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction of the Company Court under the Companies Act, 1956, and Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, did not extend to adjudicating civil disputes post-property sale. The application was deemed inadmissible as it did not pertain to the implementation of the sanctioned scheme. No costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341605 The Court dismissed the company application as not maintainable, stating that the reliefs sought did not relate to the sanctioned scheme but rather to a civil dispute over property title. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction of the Company Court under the Companies Act, 1956, and Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, did not extend to adjudicating civil disputes post-property sale. The application was deemed inadmissible as it did not pertain to the implementation of the sanctioned scheme. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341605