https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191680 The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the challenged orders from 2013 and confirming the petitioner's exempted status under the RTI Act. The petitioner, identified as an exempted organization through a Notification dated 27th March, 2008, was not compelled to disclose the information sought, as it did not pertain to corruption or human rights violations. The Court emphasized the applicability of Section 24(1) of the RTI Act in exempting certain organizations, leading to the decision in favor of the petitioner. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:00:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191680 The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the challenged orders from 2013 and confirming the petitioner's exempted status under the RTI Act. The petitioner, identified as an exempted organization through a Notification dated 27th March, 2008, was not compelled to disclose the information sought, as it did not pertain to corruption or human rights violations. The Court emphasized the applicability of Section 24(1) of the RTI Act in exempting certain organizations, leading to the decision in favor of the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191680