<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (2) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191662</link>
    <description>Acquisition of Cis Sutlej Jagir land is discussed as involving a limited estate, not absolute ownership, so the reversionary heir has an interest in compensation apportionment. The commentary states that compensation should not be kept permanently in investment for the reversioner&#039;s benefit; instead, it should be equitably apportioned between the limited holder and the reversioner. It also explains that interest on compensation may run from the date possession is taken until payment or deposit, unless the governing statute clearly excludes that equitable right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (2) TMI 77 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191662</link>
      <description>Acquisition of Cis Sutlej Jagir land is discussed as involving a limited estate, not absolute ownership, so the reversionary heir has an interest in compensation apportionment. The commentary states that compensation should not be kept permanently in investment for the reversioner&#039;s benefit; instead, it should be equitably apportioned between the limited holder and the reversioner. It also explains that interest on compensation may run from the date possession is taken until payment or deposit, unless the governing statute clearly excludes that equitable right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>