<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (4) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7515</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 is competent where the Income-tax Officer acquires information from later proceedings showing the significance of material already on record, provided the case is not a mere change of opinion on fully appreciated facts. The original return and balance-sheet did not clearly reveal that borrowed funds were being diverted for partners&#039; interest-free advances, but later assessment proceedings brought that effect into focus. The HC held that such later realisation could constitute &quot;information&quot; for reopening, so the reassessment was valid and the reference was answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (4) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7515</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 is competent where the Income-tax Officer acquires information from later proceedings showing the significance of material already on record, provided the case is not a mere change of opinion on fully appreciated facts. The original return and balance-sheet did not clearly reveal that borrowed funds were being diverted for partners&#039; interest-free advances, but later assessment proceedings brought that effect into focus. The HC held that such later realisation could constitute &quot;information&quot; for reopening, so the reassessment was valid and the reference was answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>