https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341584 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision regarding discrepancies in the stock position of PVC compound, central excise duty demand, and exemption under Notification No.67/95-CE for captively consumed intermediate product. The appellants were directed to provide additional documentary evidence for consideration within six months, emphasizing the need for proper maintenance of statutory records and reconciliation of production and issue slips. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to provide a speaking order, keeping all issues open for further examination. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:17:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341584 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision regarding discrepancies in the stock position of PVC compound, central excise duty demand, and exemption under Notification No.67/95-CE for captively consumed intermediate product. The appellants were directed to provide additional documentary evidence for consideration within six months, emphasizing the need for proper maintenance of statutory records and reconciliation of production and issue slips. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to provide a speaking order, keeping all issues open for further examination. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341584