https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341575 Anti-dumping analysis on metallurgical coke confirmed that the product scope could include higher-ash and below 12.5% ash coke where technical and commercial substitutability, domestic supply patterns, and goods characteristics supported that treatment; tariff classification was only indicative. Captive producers were excluded from the domestic industry because the anti-dumping rules distinguish captive consumption from commercial sale. The injury and causal-link findings were sustained on evidence of import surge, price undercutting and underselling, and adverse injury indicators, with alternate causation arguments rejected. The anti-dumping duty and final findings were therefore maintained on all material issues. en-us Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341575 Anti-dumping analysis on metallurgical coke confirmed that the product scope could include higher-ash and below 12.5% ash coke where technical and commercial substitutability, domestic supply patterns, and goods characteristics supported that treatment; tariff classification was only indicative. Captive producers were excluded from the domestic industry because the anti-dumping rules distinguish captive consumption from commercial sale. The injury and causal-link findings were sustained on evidence of import surge, price undercutting and underselling, and adverse injury indicators, with alternate causation arguments rejected. The anti-dumping duty and final findings were therefore maintained on all material issues. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341575