<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 541 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341571</link>
    <description>The interim order was treated as a final order, the intervention applications were disposed of, and the appeals were directed to be listed before the respective Benches for further orders in accordance with the Larger Bench directions. The operative effect was to regularise the procedural status of the order and route the matters back to the appropriate Benches for disposal consistent with the Larger Bench guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:16:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 541 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341571</link>
      <description>The interim order was treated as a final order, the intervention applications were disposed of, and the appeals were directed to be listed before the respective Benches for further orders in accordance with the Larger Bench directions. The operative effect was to regularise the procedural status of the order and route the matters back to the appropriate Benches for disposal consistent with the Larger Bench guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>