https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341566 A connected commercial dispute arising from a continuing contractual relationship permitted joinder of related claims because the declarations, injunction and recovery reliefs formed part of the same transaction and could be tried together. The broad arbitration clause in the written agreement also extended to the later oral arrangement, which was treated as a continuation or substitution of the same contractual framework. As the statutory conditions under Section 8 were satisfied, the civil court had no jurisdiction to continue the suit and the disputes had to be referred to arbitration. The appeal was allowed, the High Court orders were set aside, and the matter was directed to the already appointed sole arbitrator. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:15:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341566 A connected commercial dispute arising from a continuing contractual relationship permitted joinder of related claims because the declarations, injunction and recovery reliefs formed part of the same transaction and could be tried together. The broad arbitration clause in the written agreement also extended to the later oral arrangement, which was treated as a continuation or substitution of the same contractual framework. As the statutory conditions under Section 8 were satisfied, the civil court had no jurisdiction to continue the suit and the disputes had to be referred to arbitration. The appeal was allowed, the High Court orders were set aside, and the matter was directed to the already appointed sole arbitrator. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341566