<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Confirms Retroactive Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act; Amendment Deemed Clarificatory.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34291</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) - Effect of amendment to clause 3 (iii) and Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c) - SC confirmed the order of HC imposing penalty wherein it was observed that the amendment is clarificatory and not substantive and would apply even to assessment year prior to April 1, 2003</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:14:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Confirms Retroactive Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act; Amendment Deemed Clarificatory.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34291</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) - Effect of amendment to clause 3 (iii) and Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c) - SC confirmed the order of HC imposing penalty wherein it was observed that the amendment is clarificatory and not substantive and would apply even to assessment year prior to April 1, 2003</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:14:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>