<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 529 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341559</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment order and remitting the matter back to the respondent to pass a speaking order on objections within four weeks. The respondent must then pass the final order on merits within an additional four weeks. No costs were imposed, and miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 529 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341559</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment order and remitting the matter back to the respondent to pass a speaking order on objections within four weeks. The respondent must then pass the final order on merits within an additional four weeks. No costs were imposed, and miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>