<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 522 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341552</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the assessee eligible for exemption under Section 54EC as investments in REC/NHAI bonds were made within six months of receiving sale consideration. The tribunal emphasized interpreting Section 54EC reasonably to encourage investments in specified bonds. The addition by the AO was deleted, and the tribunal left the question of the taxability of gains from the sale of TDR open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 522 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341552</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the assessee eligible for exemption under Section 54EC as investments in REC/NHAI bonds were made within six months of receiving sale consideration. The tribunal emphasized interpreting Section 54EC reasonably to encourage investments in specified bonds. The addition by the AO was deleted, and the tribunal left the question of the taxability of gains from the sale of TDR open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>